If it may possibly be morally permissible for God to destroy innocents, is it fair to say our morals are superior to his?
Problem by Y!A is Dead: If it may be morally permissible for God to eliminate innocents, is it honest to say our morals are superior to his?
The argument as I know it is introduced when Christians are defending their faith from the problem of evil. I will consider and be careful not to use a strawman the following but its one thing like: our puny human comprehension of morality and the universe is so vastly inferior to God’s we are not able to understand it, so when god is carrying out or enabling points that seem horrific to us it’s really morally excellent simply because god does it.
Sounds like “god’s program”, perhaps he is undertaking it to build people’s faith, to aid folks uncover god through catastrophe. But my issue is why in the planet would he opt to make us suffer so we can discover him via faith as a substitute of just offering us with some directly verifiable evidence of his existence. If God’s program includes the needless fatalities of numerous innocent individuals then count me out.
Greatest reply:
Answer by livelikeriley
I feel it’s truthful to say we are morally superior to the bronze age storytellers who produced up the notion of the christian/jewish god. The god of the bible only displays the bigotry and selfishness of a quite brutish time in human historical past. We’ve moved over and above that and so sure, are morally superior to what christians refer to as “god”.
What do you feel? Solution underneath!

